PMBS vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by PIMCO, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMBS returned 7.05% vs 4.68% for MINT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

PMBS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.84% return.

PMBS

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 7.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.48%
• 10Y*: 2.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBS vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.03%	8.92%	-2.75%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.84%	4.74%	1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and MINT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

PMBS vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBS

PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 50
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMBS	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	17.12	-15.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	65.68	-63.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	20.57	-19.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	94.51	-92.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	941.34	-933.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMBS vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMBS	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	17.12	-15.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	6.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	2.47	-1.62

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMBS	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-4.62%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-0.05%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	0.00%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-0.17%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	0.00%	+0.87%

Volatility

PMBS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMBS	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	0.09%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.09%	0.20%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22%	0.27%	+3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.87%	0.58%	+4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.87%	0.95%	+3.92%

PMBS vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMBS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	4.98%	4.73%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMBS and MINT in my portfolio?

PMBS and MINT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMBS or MINT?

PMBS has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, PMBS or MINT?

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 7.05% vs 4.68% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMBS or MINT?

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMBS or MINT?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMBS or MINT?

PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.

What is the main difference between PMBS and MINT?

PMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.12 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.