PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAY vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMAY vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.


PMAY

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.20%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.26%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*

SCHX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAY vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
4.47%10.26%14.08%12.05%-8.08%7.80%11.97%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
10.72%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%37.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAY and SCHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.88

The correlation between PMAY and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PMAY vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PMAY
SCHX

Technology

36.2%
37.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
9.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PMAY
36.2%
SCHX
37.5%

Financial Services

PMAY
11.9%
SCHX
9.9%

Communication Services

PMAY
10.9%
SCHX
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PMAY
10.1%
SCHX
9.7%

Healthcare

PMAY
8.4%
SCHX
8.4%

Industrials

PMAY
8.1%
SCHX
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

PMAY
4.9%
SCHX
4.5%

Energy

PMAY
3.5%
SCHX
3.4%

Utilities

PMAY
2.3%
SCHX
2.6%

Real Estate

PMAY
1.9%
SCHX
2.0%

Basic Materials

PMAY
1.8%
SCHX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMAY vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAY
PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAY vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMAYSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.41

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.34

3.05

+4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.09

13.85

+27.24

PMAY vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAY Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAY and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMAYSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.29

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.78

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.85

+0.15

Drawdowns

PMAY vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAYSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-34.33%

+21.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-9.02%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

-19.04%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.05%

-25.41%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.70%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-3.97%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

1.98%

-1.70%

Volatility

PMAY vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is 1.24%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that PMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMAYSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

2.91%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

9.02%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

11.99%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

17.12%

-8.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.40%

18.15%

-9.75%

PMAY vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMAY vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.01%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMAY and SCHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to PMAY (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAY dropped -13.05% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 7.21% for PMAY. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PMAY.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PMAY.

PMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. PMAY tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAY and 0.03% for SCHX.

PMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMAY and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer