PAPR vs. MTBA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. PAPR is passively managed, while MTBA is actively managed. Over the past year, PAPR returned 14.71% vs 4.42% for MTBA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.

Performance

PAPR vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.06% return.

PAPR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: —

MTBA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPR vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April	7.62%	6.58%	12.28%	5.42%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	-0.06%	7.74%	1.99%	3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PAPR and MTBA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.23

The correlation between PAPR and MTBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAPR vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPR

PAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
PAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 39
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPR vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAPR	MTBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.33	1.43	+2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.62	2.02	+5.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.05	1.28	+0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.74	1.57	+11.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	66.73	4.96	+61.77

PAPR vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.33, which is higher than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPR and MTBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAPR vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and MTBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAPR	MTBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-3.48%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.16%	-2.82%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-1.44%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-0.80%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	0.89%	-0.67%

Volatility

PAPR vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.96%. This indicates that PAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAPR	MTBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	0.96%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	2.57%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	3.10%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.22%	3.95%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.42%	3.95%	+5.47%

PAPR vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAPR vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

PAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.08%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAPR and MTBA in my portfolio?

PAPR and MTBA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAPR or MTBA?

PAPR has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to MTBA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPR dropped -15.31% vs MTBA's -3.48%.

Which ETF is better, PAPR or MTBA?

On 1-year performance, PAPR leads with 14.71% vs 4.42% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAPR or MTBA?

Over the 1-year period, PAPR has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAPR or MTBA?

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAPR or MTBA?

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.00% for PAPR.

What is the main difference between PAPR and MTBA?

PAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAPR and 0.15% for MTBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.