PMAR vs. BUFF
PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PMAR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMAR returned 9.61%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
PMAR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.70% return.
PMAR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
PMAR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 6.36% | 11.82% | 12.83% | 15.95% | -2.65% | 10.96% | 6.64% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.70% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAR and BUFF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PMAR and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
PMAR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PMAR
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PMAR
BUFF
Financial Services
PMAR
BUFF
Communication Services
PMAR
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
PMAR
BUFF
Healthcare
PMAR
BUFF
Industrials
PMAR
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
PMAR
BUFF
Energy
PMAR
BUFF
Utilities
PMAR
BUFF
Real Estate
PMAR
BUFF
Basic Materials
PMAR
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
PMAR
BUFF
PMAR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 2.94 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.52 | 4.44 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.61 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 4.30 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.14 | 23.03 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 2.94 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.49 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
PMAR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -46.23% | +29.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -3.58% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.32% | -10.24% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | -10.24% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -6.19% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.67% | +0.02% |
Volatility
PMAR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 0.83%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.96% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | 3.82% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 5.15% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 8.41% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.73% | 17.68% | -6.95% |
PMAR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMAR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFF has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PMAR (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, PMAR leads with 9.61% vs 8.80% for BUFF. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PMAR has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
PMAR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PMAR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAR and 0.89% for BUFF.
PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAR and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer