PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAR vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMAR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.70% return.


PMAR

1D
0.06%
1M
1.94%
YTD
6.36%
6M
7.38%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
0.19%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.70%
6M
6.36%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March
6.36%11.82%12.83%15.95%-2.65%10.96%6.64%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.70%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAR and BUFF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.86

The correlation between PMAR and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

PMAR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PMAR
BUFF

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PMAR
36.2%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

PMAR
11.9%
BUFF
11.9%

Communication Services

PMAR
10.9%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PMAR
10.1%
BUFF
10.1%

Healthcare

PMAR
8.4%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

PMAR
8.1%
BUFF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

PMAR
4.9%
BUFF
4.9%

Energy

PMAR
3.5%
BUFF
3.5%

Utilities

PMAR
2.3%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

PMAR
1.9%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

PMAR
1.8%
BUFF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMAR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAR
PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMARBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.01

2.94

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.52

4.44

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.61

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

4.30

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.14

23.03

+0.11

PMAR vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAR and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMARBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

2.94

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

1.05

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.49

+0.42

Drawdowns

PMAR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMARBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-46.23%

+29.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-3.58%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.32%

-10.24%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

-10.24%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-6.19%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.67%

+0.02%

Volatility

PMAR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 0.83%, while Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMARBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.96%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

3.82%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

5.15%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

8.41%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.73%

17.68%

-6.95%

PMAR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMAR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
PMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMAR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PMAR (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, PMAR leads with 9.61% vs 8.80% for BUFF. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PMAR has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

PMAR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PMAR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAR and 0.89% for BUFF.

PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMAR and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer