PMAQX vs. NEEGX
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 5.10%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for NEEGX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.
Performance
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 43.95% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
NEEGX
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -7.95%
- 6M
- 30.57%
- YTD
- 43.95%
- 1Y
- 62.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -4.40% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 43.95% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and NEEGX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMAQX and NEEGX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
NEEGX
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAQX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 4.66 | -5.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 13.88 | -14.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and NEEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -53.60% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -13.27% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -38.66% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | -43.35% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -12.93% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -10.87% | +4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 4.44% | +5.06% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) is 3.93%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 14.79%. This indicates that PMAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 14.79% | -10.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 25.40% | -13.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 31.02% | -16.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 29.16% | -10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 25.72% | -6.29% |
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than NEEGX's 5.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 5.26% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.07% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEEGX has higher volatility (14.79%) compared to PMAQX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.
NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and NEEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer