PM vs. MFC
PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) and MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) are both stocks. PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PM returned 12.20%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for MFC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PM vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 22.23% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has underperformed MFC with an annualized return of 12.20%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 30.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
MFC
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 1Y
- 43.32%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.55%
PM vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 22.23% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 19.41% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and MFC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PM and MFC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PM:
$300.37B
MFC:
$70.93B
PM:
$7.11
MFC:
CA$4.17
PM:
27.09
MFC:
14.27
PM:
2.94
MFC:
5.01
PM:
7.24
MFC:
1.15
PM:
$41.49B
MFC:
CA$79.35B
PM:
$27.93B
MFC:
CA$26.46B
PM:
$17.74B
MFC:
CA$8.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
PM
MFC
PM vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PM | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 3.48 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 10.70 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PM vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum MFC drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and MFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -83.61% | +40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.28% | -12.49% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -16.75% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -26.99% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -57.44% | +14.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.05% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -29.29% | +19.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | 4.06% | +6.02% |
Volatility
PM vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) at 4.97%. This indicates that PM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PM | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.45% | 4.97% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | 16.10% | +6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.89% | 20.29% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.06% | 24.08% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 28.11% | -3.52% |
Dividends
PM vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than MFC's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.14% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.05% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
PM vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Philip Morris International Inc. and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PM vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PM and MFC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to MFC (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs MFC's -83.61%.
MFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PM and MFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer