PLYY vs. AMDW
PLYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
PLYY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLYY achieves a -28.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 150.89% return.
PLYY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- 6M
- 113.70%
- YTD
- 150.89%
- 1Y
- 214.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 231.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.29M | $9.36M | $8.60M | |
| $52.81K | $54.69K | $65.16K |
PLYY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | -28.21% | -3.83% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 150.89% | 37.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLYY and AMDW is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLYY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank
PLYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDW
PLYY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLYY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLYY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLYY drawdown since its inception was -39.49%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLYY and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLYY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.49% | -34.64% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.66% | -20.07% | -17.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -13.99% | -7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.63% | — |
Volatility
PLYY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLYY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 66.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.68% | 85.77% | -58.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 84.89% | -57.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 84.89% | -57.21% |
PLYY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLYY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
PLYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 139.63%, more than AMDW's 55.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 55.51% | 34.78% |
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | 139.63% | 32.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLYY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PLYY.
PLYY has the higher dividend yield at 139.63%, compared with 55.51% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLYY and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for PLYY and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer