PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLXS vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLXS vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plexus Corp. (PLXS) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLXS achieves a 90.56% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PLXS has outperformed NEE with an annualized return of 20.35%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.68% annualized return.


PLXS

1D
3.21%
1M
5.87%
YTD
90.56%
6M
92.64%
1Y
114.54%
3Y*
43.99%
5Y*
23.62%
10Y*
20.35%

NEE

1D
2.41%
1M
-11.62%
YTD
7.45%
6M
1.99%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLXS vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLXS
Plexus Corp.
90.56%-6.06%44.71%5.05%7.34%22.61%1.65%50.63%-15.88%12.36%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
7.45%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PLXS and NEE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2003

0.23

The correlation between PLXS and NEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PLXS:

$6.84

NEE:

$5.27

PE Ratio

PLXS:

40.96

NEE:

16.26

PEG Ratio

PLXS:

3.97

NEE:

0.83

PS Ratio

PLXS:

1.78

NEE:

4.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLXS:

$4.31B

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLXS:

$433.39M

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLXS:

$259.04M

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLXS vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLXS
PLXS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PLXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLXS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PLXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLXS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLXS vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plexus Corp. (PLXS) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLXSNEEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

1.05

+1.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

1.56

+1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.31

1.71

+5.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.71

5.24

+17.47

PLXS vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLXS and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLXSNEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

1.05

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.23

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.54

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

PLXS vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLXS drawdown since its inception was -90.22%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLXS and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLXSNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.22%

-47.81%

-42.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.51%

-14.53%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-34.57%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.92%

-44.97%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.68%

-44.97%

-8.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.46%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.50%

-8.92%

-31.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

4.75%

+0.24%

Volatility

PLXS vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

Plexus Corp. (PLXS) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.33%. This indicates that PLXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLXSNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

8.33%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.24%

17.09%

+11.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.80%

23.77%

+15.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.48%

26.89%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.60%

25.48%

+7.12%

Dividends

PLXS vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

PLXS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.05%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%
PLXS
Plexus Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLXS vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plexus Corp. and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
1.16B
6.70B
(PLXS) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLXS vs. NEE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plexus Corp. and NextEra Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
10.2%
0
Portfolio components
PLXS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plexus Corp. reported a gross profit of 119.18M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.2%.

NEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PLXS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plexus Corp. reported an operating income of 61.84M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

NEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

PLXS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plexus Corp. reported a net income of 49.81M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

NEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLXS and NEE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLXS has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to NEE (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLXS dropped -90.22% vs NEE's -47.81%.

PLXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLXS and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer