PLW vs. XHLF
PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - PLW tracks the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index while XHLF tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PLW returned 0.89%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for XHLF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XHLF.
Performance
PLW vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 1.39% return.
PLW
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 0.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.77%
- 10Y*
- -0.10%
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLW vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | -0.55% | 5.84% | -2.95% | 3.31% | -3.42% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.39% | 4.21% | 5.04% | 4.90% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLW and XHLF is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PLW and XHLF has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLW vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank
PLW
XHLF
PLW vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLW | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -44.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 11.75 | -10.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 98.81 | -98.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 670.31 | -668.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLW | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 12.43 | -11.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 10.75 | -10.43 |
Drawdowns
PLW vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and XHLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLW | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.70% | -0.11% | -32.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -0.04% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -0.06% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.38% | 0.00% | -22.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -0.00% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.01% | +1.93% |
Volatility
PLW vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.08%. This indicates that PLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLW | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 0.08% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | 0.22% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.58% | 0.32% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.86% | 0.42% | +9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 0.42% | +8.68% |
PLW vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PLW vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison
PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, which matches XHLF's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 2.87% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.00% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.00% | 2.14% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.85% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLW and XHLF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLW has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to XHLF (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLW dropped -32.70% vs XHLF's -0.11%.
On 3-year performance, XHLF leads with 4.62% vs 0.89% for PLW. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 4.62% return vs 0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PLW.
XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.83% for PLW.
PLW tracks Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.03% for XHLF.
XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.43 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLW and XHLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer