PLW vs. TLTX
PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. PLW is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
PLW vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than TLTX's 1.13% return.
PLW
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 0.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -0.18%
TLTX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLW vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 0.12% | 4.57% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 1.13% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLW and TLTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLW vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
PLW
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLW vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLW vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.70% | -6.35% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.86% | -2.62% | -19.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -2.29% | -7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
PLW vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.42% | 9.26% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 9.26% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 9.26% | -0.17% |
PLW vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLW vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than TLTX's 17.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 3.82% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 2.87% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.00% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.00% | 2.14% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.25% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLW and TLTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.25%, compared with 3.82% for PLW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for PLW and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer