PLW vs. TLTX
PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. PLW is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. Over the past year, PLW returned 0.11% vs -0.71% for TLTX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
PLW vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -2.60% return.
PLW
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- -3.79%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.91%
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.68M | $4.78M | $7.09M | |
| $161.97K | $191.43K | $332.84K |
PLW vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | -1.49% | 4.57% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -2.60% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLW and TLTX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PLW and TLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLW vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
PLW
TLTX
PLW vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.11 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | -0.23 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLW vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.70% | -6.70% | -26.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -6.70% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.12% | -6.20% | -16.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -2.52% | -7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 3.08% | -0.68% |
Volatility
PLW vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) is 1.78%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.96% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.88% | 7.30% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24% | 9.45% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.82% | 9.41% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 9.41% | -0.34% |
PLW vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLW vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than TLTX's 19.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 2.87% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.00% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.00% | 2.14% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 19.20% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLW and TLTX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PLW (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLW dropped -32.70% vs TLTX's -6.70%.
On 1-year performance, PLW leads with 0.11% vs -0.71% for TLTX. On fees, PLW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PLW has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLW has performed better with a 0.11% return vs -0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.20%, compared with 3.92% for PLW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.29% for TLTX.
PLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLW and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer