PLW vs. GGOV
PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLW is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
PLW vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.30% return.
PLW
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 0.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.77%
- 10Y*
- -0.10%
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLW vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | -0.55% | 2.47% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.30% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLW and GGOV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLW vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
PLW
GGOV
PLW vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.11 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PLW vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.70% | -4.69% | -28.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.38% | -1.50% | -20.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -1.59% | -8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
PLW vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.58% | 5.38% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.86% | 5.38% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 5.38% | +3.72% |
PLW vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLW vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 2.87% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.00% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.00% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLW and GGOV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
PLW has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
PLW is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for PLW and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer