PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUSX vs. SEMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLUSX achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than SEMGX's 33.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX has underperformed SEMGX with an annualized return of 7.65%, while SEMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


PLUSX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.22%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.65%

SEMGX

1D
1.42%
1M
10.48%
YTD
33.80%
6M
37.41%
1Y
59.84%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
8.80%13.39%8.31%13.89%-14.98%13.24%8.21%19.71%-7.64%13.81%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
33.80%28.85%7.48%6.32%-21.66%-11.60%18.65%19.23%-12.25%37.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUSX and SEMGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2004

0.76

The correlation between PLUSX and SEMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUSX vs. SEMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUSX
PLUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMGX
SEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLUSXSEMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

3.05

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

3.85

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.55

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.80

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.09

15.35

-2.26

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUSX and SEMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLUSXSEMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.05

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.30

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.54

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.28

+0.11

Drawdowns

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUSX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum SEMGX drawdown of -67.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUSX and SEMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUSXSEMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-67.21%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-16.11%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.31%

-18.37%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-41.42%

+20.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.65%

-45.82%

+20.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-25.25%

+17.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

3.97%

-2.46%

Volatility

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) is 2.63%, while DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that PLUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUSXSEMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

8.31%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

16.81%

-10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

20.04%

-11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

18.68%

-7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

18.32%

-6.93%

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLUSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMGX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLUSX vs. SEMGX - Dividend Comparison

PLUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than SEMGX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
2.48%2.70%41.59%5.78%2.99%9.67%4.22%5.80%5.55%5.58%6.05%10.87%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.24%3.00%0.15%2.16%2.16%1.71%1.23%1.94%0.71%0.62%0.54%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUSX and SEMGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMGX has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to PLUSX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUSX dropped -53.39% vs SEMGX's -67.21%.

SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUSX and SEMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer