PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUSX vs. SCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLUSX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCINX's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX has underperformed SCINX with an annualized return of 7.76%, while SCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


PLUSX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.83%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.64%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
7.76%

SCINX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.37%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
8.04%13.39%8.31%13.89%-14.98%13.24%8.21%19.71%-7.64%13.81%
SCINX
DWS CROCI International Fund
8.76%44.99%2.37%18.85%-13.29%9.30%3.00%21.45%-14.47%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUSX and SCINX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004

0.83

The correlation between PLUSX and SCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUSX vs. SCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUSX
PLUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PLUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCINX
SCINX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLUSXSCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.73

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

8.95

+3.15

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SCINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUSX and SCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUSX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum SCINX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUSX and SCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUSXSCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-63.90%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-12.28%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.31%

-14.23%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-29.91%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.65%

-35.59%

+9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-4.23%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-16.88%

+9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

3.74%

-2.19%

Volatility

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) at 3.39%. This indicates that PLUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUSXSCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.39%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

10.92%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

13.99%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.84%

15.83%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.44%

16.05%

-4.61%

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLUSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SCINX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLUSX vs. SCINX - Dividend Comparison

PLUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than SCINX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
2.50%2.70%41.59%5.78%2.99%9.67%4.22%5.80%5.55%5.58%6.05%10.87%
SCINX
DWS CROCI International Fund
2.53%2.75%3.20%3.55%3.48%3.89%1.80%3.39%3.73%2.49%3.76%3.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUSX and SCINX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLUSX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to SCINX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUSX dropped -53.39% vs SCINX's -63.90%.

SCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUSX and SCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer