PLUSX vs. MGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX).
PLUSX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Oct 31, 2004. MGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 14, 1995.
Performance
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLUSX DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund | -1.15% | 13.39% | 8.31% | 13.89% | -14.98% | 13.24% | 8.21% | 19.71% | -7.64% | 13.81% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 0.35% | 14.73% | 3.56% | 9.15% | -6.87% | 6.36% | 2.26% | 12.61% | 0.33% | 13.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLUSX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than MGINX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX has outperformed MGINX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while MGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.
PLUSX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
MGINX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLUSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MGINX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLUSX vs. MGINX — Risk / Return Rank
PLUSX
MGINX
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLUSX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.52 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 2.15 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.73 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 7.72 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLUSX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.52 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.79 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLUSX and MGINX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Dividend Comparison
PLUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than MGINX's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLUSX DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund | 2.73% | 2.70% | 41.59% | 5.78% | 2.99% | 9.67% | 4.22% | 5.80% | 5.55% | 5.58% | 6.05% | 10.87% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 2.25% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.88% | 4.76% | 1.20% | 0.81% | 3.23% | 6.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLUSX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum MGINX drawdown of -63.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUSX and MGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLUSX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -63.39% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.03% | -7.01% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -12.16% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.65% | -15.12% | -10.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -5.25% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -13.83% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.57% | +0.20% |
Volatility
PLUSX vs. MGINX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) at 3.52%. This indicates that PLUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLUSX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.52% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.41% | 5.88% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 8.03% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 6.67% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 7.50% | +3.87% |