PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. SCOBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than SCOBX's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MGINX has underperformed SCOBX with an annualized return of 5.98%, while SCOBX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


MGINX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.77%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.14%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
5.98%

SCOBX

1D
0.56%
1M
5.15%
YTD
8.40%
6M
10.68%
1Y
15.47%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
4.24%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%12.61%0.33%13.65%
SCOBX
DWS International Growth Fund
8.40%19.45%9.37%15.76%-29.24%8.23%22.49%31.61%-16.88%25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and SCOBX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1995

0.83

The correlation between MGINX and SCOBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. SCOBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCOBX
SCOBX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SCOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SCOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGINXSCOBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.09

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

1.66

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.35

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.65

4.88

+2.77

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SCOBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and SCOBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGINXSCOBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.09

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.20

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.44

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SCOBX drawdown of -62.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and SCOBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXSCOBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-62.65%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-12.41%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-15.86%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-40.92%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

-40.92%

+25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

0.00%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-11.53%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.42%

-1.60%

Volatility

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 2.80%, while DWS International Growth Fund (SCOBX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCOBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXSCOBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

5.42%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

12.40%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

15.17%

-7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

18.06%

-11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

17.52%

-10.05%

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SCOBX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. SCOBX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SCOBX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
2.17%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCOBX
DWS International Growth Fund
4.34%4.70%3.37%1.57%3.78%3.70%0.81%1.01%1.29%0.46%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and SCOBX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCOBX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to MGINX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs SCOBX's -62.65%.

MGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and SCOBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer