PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUSX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PLUSX having a 8.80% return and FSRRX slightly lower at 8.69%. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 7.65%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


PLUSX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.22%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.65%

FSRRX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.04%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
8.80%13.39%8.31%13.89%-14.98%13.24%8.21%19.71%-7.64%13.81%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.69%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUSX and FSRRX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between PLUSX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUSX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUSX
PLUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLUSXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.71

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

8.14

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

32.01

-18.92

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUSX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLUSXFSRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.55

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.93

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.84

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.20

Drawdowns

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUSX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than FSRRX's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUSX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUSXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-33.42%

-19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-2.05%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.31%

-5.80%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-12.78%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.65%

-19.93%

-5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-4.21%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.52%

+0.99%

Volatility

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.30%. This indicates that PLUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUSXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

1.30%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

3.68%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

4.71%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

6.88%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

6.73%

+4.66%

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLUSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLUSX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

PLUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSRRX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.13%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
PLUSX
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund
2.48%2.70%41.59%5.78%2.99%9.67%4.22%5.80%5.55%5.58%6.05%10.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUSX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLUSX has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to FSRRX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUSX dropped -53.39% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUSX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer