PLUSX vs. BRUFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PLUSX (DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund) and BRUFX (Bruce Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX returned 7.11%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for BRUFX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PLUSX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BRUFX.

Performance

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLUSX achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BRUFX's 16.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUSX has underperformed BRUFX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while BRUFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.

PLUSX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -1.18%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 1Y: 14.34%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 7.11%
• ALL TIME*: 5.66%

BRUFX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 11.25%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 7.56%
• ALL TIME*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BRUFX Bruce Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PLUSX DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLUSX DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund	6.38%	13.39%	8.31%	13.89%	-14.98%	13.24%	8.21%	19.71%	-7.64%	13.81%
BRUFX Bruce Fund	16.02%	14.89%	4.45%	-0.74%	-8.80%	17.35%	12.06%	22.42%	-3.99%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUSX and BRUFX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PLUSX and BRUFX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PLUSX vs. BRUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLUSX

PLUSX Risk / Return Rank: 57
PLUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PLUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PLUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PLUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PLUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BRUFX

BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 94
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLUSX	BRUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.73	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.87	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.49	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	3.78	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	17.01	-8.89

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the BRUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUSX and BRUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUSX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than BRUFX's maximum drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUSX and BRUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLUSX	BRUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.39%	-44.50%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-7.67%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.31%	-9.66%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.77%	-17.91%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.65%	-25.44%	-0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.23%	-1.71%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-9.04%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.70%	-0.07%

Volatility

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund (PLUSX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Bruce Fund (BRUFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that PLUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLUSX	BRUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	2.42%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.46%	8.50%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.10%	10.65%	-1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.87%	10.58%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.42%	11.65%	-0.23%

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLUSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BRUFX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLUSX vs. BRUFX - Dividend Comparison

PLUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than BRUFX's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRUFX Bruce Fund	5.48%	6.35%	5.01%	6.46%	13.31%	9.25%	5.83%	2.03%	2.49%	4.11%	6.26%	4.63%
PLUSX DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund	2.54%	2.70%	41.59%	5.78%	2.99%	9.67%	4.22%	5.80%	5.55%	5.58%	6.05%	10.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLUSX and BRUFX in my portfolio?

PLUSX and BRUFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLUSX or BRUFX?

PLUSX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to BRUFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUSX dropped -53.39% vs BRUFX's -44.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.