PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLU vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLU

1D
-52.17%
1M
-46.80%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-26.21%
1M
49.48%
YTD
545.56%
6M
797.25%
1Y
3,465.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLU and MULL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLU

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLUMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

5.14

-5.02

Drawdowns

PLU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLU drawdown since its inception was -66.28%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLU and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.28%

-72.29%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.28%

-37.74%

-28.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-20.65%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

Volatility

PLU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.26%

136.34%

+78.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

215.26%

138.33%

+76.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

215.26%

138.33%

+76.93%

PLU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

PLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLU and MULL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLU is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLU is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for PLU.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for PLU and 1.50% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLU and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer