PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTY vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTY vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.68% return.


PLTY

1D
-3.89%
1M
7.45%
YTD
-8.48%
6M
-7.00%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
0.33%
1M
7.02%
YTD
14.68%
6M
14.53%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTY vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.48%78.06%49.98%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.68%17.24%5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTY and QQA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024

0.53

The correlation between PLTY and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTY vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTY vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTYQQADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.65

-2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

3.56

-2.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.48

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

3.91

-3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.70

17.57

-16.87

PLTY vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTY and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTYQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.65

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

1.18

+0.20

Drawdowns

PLTY vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTYQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.61%

-19.73%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-8.76%

-25.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.62%

0.00%

-20.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-2.45%

-10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.65%

1.95%

+15.70%

Volatility

PLTY vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) at 2.91%. This indicates that PLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTYQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

2.91%

+11.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.89%

9.68%

+22.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.13%

12.61%

+30.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.81%

18.29%

+34.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.81%

18.29%

+34.52%

PLTY vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTY vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.78%, more than QQA's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
102.78%112.44%7.85%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.28%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTY and QQA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTY has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to QQA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -36.61% vs QQA's -19.73%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 33.20% vs 11.69% for PLTY. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 33.20% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTY.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 102.78%, compared with 9.28% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTY and 0.29% for QQA.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTY and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer