PLTY vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTY returned -16.47% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

PLTY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -23.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

PLTY

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -2.83%
• 6M: -8.14%
• YTD: -23.00%
• 1Y: -16.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.31%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	$4.74M	$3.96M	$6.06M

PLTY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-23.00%	8.60%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTY and AMDW is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

PLTY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTY

PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTY	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	2.36	-2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	2.92	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.36	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	5.83	-6.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	11.47	-12.30

PLTY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTY and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTY	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-34.64%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.36%	-34.64%	-6.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.22%	-21.39%	-11.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.41%	-13.97%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.78%	17.59%	+4.19%

Volatility

PLTY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) is 11.37%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that PLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTY	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.37%	28.87%	-17.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.16%	67.40%	-33.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.02%	85.70%	-41.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.23%	85.05%	-32.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.23%	85.05%	-32.82%

PLTY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTY and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

PLTY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.19%, more than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%	0.00%
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	123.19%	112.44%	7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTY and AMDW in my portfolio?

PLTY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTY or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to PLTY (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -41.36% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, PLTY or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs -16.47% for PLTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTY has been the lower-risk option at 11.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTY or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs -16.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTY or AMDW?

PLTY and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTY or AMDW?

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 123.19%, compared with 53.42% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between PLTY and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.