PLTW vs. TQQY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -22.07% vs 4.89% for TQQY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TQQY.

Performance

PLTW vs. TQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -31.53% return, which is significantly lower than TQQY's 3.32% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 5.40%
• 6M: -28.11%
• YTD: -31.53%
• 1Y: -22.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -8.79%

TQQY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 1Y: 4.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. TQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-31.53%	114.63%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	3.32%	-6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and TQQY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. TQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

TQQY

TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 14
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. TQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	TQQY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	0.23	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	0.41	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.07	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	0.25	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	0.60	-1.33

PLTW vs. TQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the TQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and TQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. TQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than TQQY's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and TQQY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	TQQY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-26.06%	-31.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.27%	-19.35%	-37.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.00%	-7.70%	-36.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.60%	-9.70%	-14.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.10%	8.20%	+21.90%

Volatility

PLTW vs. TQQY - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 18.74% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) at 3.72%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	TQQY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.74%	3.72%	+15.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.11%	13.70%	+34.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.79%	21.39%	+40.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.64%	23.28%	+50.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.64%	23.28%	+50.36%

PLTW vs. TQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQY's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. TQQY - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 128.07%, more than TQQY's 61.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	128.07%	72.40%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	61.18%	49.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and TQQY in my portfolio?

PLTW and TQQY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTW or TQQY?

PLTW has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to TQQY (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs TQQY's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or TQQY?

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 4.89% vs -22.07% for PLTW. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or TQQY?

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 4.89% return vs -22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or TQQY?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or TQQY?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.07%, compared with 61.18% for TQQY.

What is the main difference between PLTW and TQQY?

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while TQQY is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 1.07% for TQQY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.