PLTW vs. BCCC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -26.59% vs -28.91% for BCCC. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.

Performance

PLTW vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -42.11% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -23.44% return.

PLTW

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -18.15%
• YTD: -42.11%
• 6M: -48.01%
• 1Y: -26.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCCC

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -14.48%
• YTD: -23.44%
• 6M: -22.51%
• 1Y: -28.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-42.11%	34.36%
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-23.44%	-7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and BCCC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BCCC

BCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3
BCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.82	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	-1.03	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.87	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	-0.70	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	-1.27	+0.29

PLTW vs. BCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the BCCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and BCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -52.65%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and BCCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	BCCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.65%	-41.63%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.65%	-41.63%	-11.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.65%	-38.81%	-13.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.35%	-17.87%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.25%	22.86%	+4.39%

Volatility

PLTW vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 23.13% compared to Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) at 10.66%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	BCCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.13%	10.66%	+12.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.72%	28.99%	+17.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.56%	35.32%	+26.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.29%	35.04%	+39.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.29%	35.04%	+39.25%

PLTW vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.83%, more than BCCC's 63.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	63.85%	29.55%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	151.83%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and BCCC in my portfolio?

PLTW and BCCC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTW or BCCC?

PLTW has higher volatility (23.13%) compared to BCCC (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -52.65% vs BCCC's -41.63%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or BCCC?

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -26.59% vs -28.91% for BCCC. On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BCCC has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or BCCC?

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -26.59% return vs -28.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or BCCC?

BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or BCCC?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 151.83%, compared with 63.85% for BCCC.

What is the main difference between PLTW and BCCC?

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCCC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.75% for BCCC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.