PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. BCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -37.29% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -20.76% return.


PLTW

1D
2.04%
1M
-4.02%
6M
-20.95%
YTD
-37.29%
1Y
-28.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.93%

BCCC

1D
0.91%
1M
4.78%
6M
-11.40%
YTD
-20.76%
1Y
-33.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-23.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.57K$116.69K$164.22K
$2.58M$2.73M$3.69M

PLTW vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-37.29%34.36%
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
-20.76%-7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and BCCC is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BCCC
BCCC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTW vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTWBCCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.85

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.79

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-1.26

+0.35

PLTW vs. BCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is higher than the BCCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and BCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and BCCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWBCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-41.79%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.27%

-41.79%

-15.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.71%

-36.67%

-12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-19.81%

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.63%

26.16%

+5.47%

Volatility

PLTW vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) at 6.14%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWBCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.51%

6.14%

+9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.86%

28.46%

+20.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.65%

35.77%

+26.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.45%

34.19%

+39.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.45%

34.19%

+39.26%

PLTW vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTW vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.47%, more than BCCC's 59.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
59.49%29.55%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
137.47%72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and BCCC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to BCCC (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs BCCC's -41.79%.

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -28.95% vs -33.02% for BCCC. On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BCCC has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -28.95% return vs -33.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 59.49% for BCCC.

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCCC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.75% for BCCC.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and BCCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer