PLTQX vs. PMAQX
PLTQX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund) and PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) are both mutual funds - PLTQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, PLTQX returned 8.22%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for PMAQX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PLTQX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PMAQX.
Performance
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly higher than PMAQX's -2.73% return.
PLTQX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
PMAQX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTQX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund | 9.16% | 17.25% | 14.58% | 18.16% | -17.90% | 17.09% | 15.41% | 23.86% | -8.61% | 19.16% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -2.73% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTQX and PMAQX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PLTQX and PMAQX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTQX vs. PMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTQX
PMAQX
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTQX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | -0.33 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | -0.65 | +12.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, smaller than the maximum PMAQX drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and PMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTQX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.05% | -40.56% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -19.25% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.75% | -19.25% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.18% | -31.10% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -9.05% | +8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -6.89% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 9.83% | -8.14% |
Volatility
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) is 3.10%, while Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that PLTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTQX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 5.29% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 12.15% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.87% | 15.26% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 18.76% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 19.43% | -5.66% |
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PMAQX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTQX vs. PMAQX - Dividend Comparison
PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than PMAQX's 5.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTQX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund | 4.12% | 4.50% | 4.19% | 3.14% | 8.95% | 5.00% | 3.85% | 3.84% | 4.47% | 2.37% | 2.34% | 1.65% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 5.96% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTQX and PMAQX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMAQX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PLTQX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs PMAQX's -40.56%.
PLTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTQX and PMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer