PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. FSNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than FSNKX's 5.55% return.


PLTQX

1D
1.07%
1M
1.53%
YTD
8.79%
6M
8.62%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
10.54%

FSNKX

1D
0.65%
1M
1.38%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.70%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
8.79%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%7.19%
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
5.55%11.42%5.33%9.94%-13.18%5.67%11.22%14.40%-3.50%4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and FSNKX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.86

The correlation between PLTQX and FSNKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. FSNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FSNKX
FSNKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FSNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTQXFSNKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.12

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

13.38

+0.23

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FSNKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and FSNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, which is greater than FSNKX's maximum drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and FSNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXFSNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-18.31%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-4.00%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-5.76%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-18.31%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-3.59%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.93%

+0.70%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX) at 2.46%. This indicates that PLTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXFSNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

2.46%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

4.69%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

5.43%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

6.46%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

6.47%

+7.36%

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FSNKX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than FSNKX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
4.67%4.99%3.05%2.83%7.28%9.36%6.05%5.83%7.26%3.53%0.00%0.00%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.14%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTQX and FSNKX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTQX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to FSNKX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs FSNKX's -18.31%.

FSNKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and FSNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer