PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. FSNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than FSNKX's 4.25% return.


PLTQX

1D
1.42%
1M
-0.06%
6M
5.51%
YTD
8.07%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.09%
ALL TIME*
9.45%

FSNKX

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.72%
6M
2.72%
YTD
4.25%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
8.07%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%7.19%
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
4.25%11.42%5.33%9.94%-13.18%5.67%11.22%14.40%-3.50%4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and FSNKX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.86

The correlation between PLTQX and FSNKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. FSNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSNKX
FSNKX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FSNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTQXFSNKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.26

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

9.19

+0.58

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FSNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and FSNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, which is greater than FSNKX's maximum drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and FSNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXFSNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-18.31%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-4.00%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-4.77%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-18.31%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.23%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-3.56%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

0.98%

+0.71%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX) at 1.71%. This indicates that PLTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXFSNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

1.71%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

4.96%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

5.65%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

6.51%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

6.46%

+7.31%

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FSNKX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. FSNKX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than FSNKX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
4.73%4.99%3.05%2.83%7.28%9.36%6.05%5.83%7.26%3.53%0.00%0.00%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.16%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PLTQX and FSNKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTQX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to FSNKX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs FSNKX's -18.31%.

FSNKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and FSNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer