PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLTQX having a 9.40% return and PLTZX slightly higher at 9.67%. Over the past 10 years, PLTQX has underperformed PLTZX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while PLTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


PLTQX

1D
0.39%
1M
4.46%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.81%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.54%

PLTZX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
9.40%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.67%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and PLTZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PLTQX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTQXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.68

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.92

12.08

+2.84

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTQXPLTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.98

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.70

0.00

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-34.01%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-8.70%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-15.73%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-26.79%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-34.01%

+4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.63%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.93%

-0.34%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) is 2.91%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that PLTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.30%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

9.44%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

11.80%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

15.46%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

15.99%

-2.19%

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.11%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.60%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PLTQX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PLTQX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

PLTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer