PLTNX vs. LTINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX).
PLTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. LTINX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008.
Performance
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | -1.70% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | -0.85% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 16.32% | -4.72% | 13.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTNX achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than LTINX's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTNX has outperformed LTINX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while LTINX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.25% annualized return.
PLTNX
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
LTINX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LTINX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PLTNX vs. LTINX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTNX
LTINX
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTNX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.81 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.71 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 7.39 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTNX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.86 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTNX and LTINX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Dividend Comparison
PLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than LTINX's 12.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.67% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 12.01% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
Drawdowns
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTNX drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum LTINX drawdown of -44.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTNX and LTINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTNX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -44.03% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -4.98% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.48% | -18.54% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | -18.54% | -14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -3.10% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -5.22% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.15% | +1.24% |
Volatility
PLTNX vs. LTINX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) at 2.75%. This indicates that PLTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLTNX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 2.75% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 3.97% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 6.59% | +9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 7.32% | +8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 7.32% | +8.48% |