PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTI vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF (PLTI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTI achieves a -20.94% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 5.92% return.


PLTI

1D
-4.31%
1M
3.89%
YTD
-20.94%
6M
-22.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-1.82%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
5.92%
6M
7.78%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTI
REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF
-20.94%-9.13%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
5.92%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTI and QYLD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTI

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF (PLTI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTIQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.58

-1.37

Drawdowns

PLTI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTI drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTI and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTIQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-24.75%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.15%

-1.87%

-26.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-3.84%

-16.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

PLTI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTIQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.01%

8.78%

+46.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.01%

14.71%

+40.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.01%

15.50%

+39.51%

PLTI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

PLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, more than QYLD's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTI
REX PLTR Growth & Income ETF
12.20%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.67%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTI.

PLTI has the higher dividend yield at 12.20%, compared with 11.67% for QYLD.

PLTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: REX and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTI and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTI and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer