PLTG vs. BILT
PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BILT is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -48.29% vs 15.54% for BILT. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
PLTG vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -42.26% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 12.87% return.
PLTG
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- 31.28%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -42.26%
- 1Y
- -48.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
BILT
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $538.18K | $1.61M | $1.70M | |
| $6.27M | $4.68M | $5.05M |
PLTG vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -42.26% | 6.10% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 12.87% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTG and BILT is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTG vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
PLTG
BILT
PLTG vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTG | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.90 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 8.60 | -9.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTG vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTG | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -5.38% | -74.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.11% | -5.38% | -74.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.76% | -3.47% | -57.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -1.38% | -34.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.79% | 1.81% | +47.98% |
Volatility
PLTG vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 53.92% compared to iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) at 2.78%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTG | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.92% | 2.78% | +51.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.27% | 8.43% | +84.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.64% | 10.33% | +109.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.40% | 10.35% | +107.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.40% | 10.35% | +107.05% |
PLTG vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTG vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.42%, more than BILT's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.77% | 0.99% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 31.42% | 18.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTG and BILT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to BILT (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -80.11% vs BILT's -5.38%.
On 1-year performance, BILT leads with 15.54% vs -48.29% for PLTG. On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILT has performed better with a 15.54% return vs -48.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PLTG.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 31.42%, compared with 5.77% for BILT.
PLTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILT is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.60% for BILT.
BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTG and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer