PLTG vs. BILD
PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BILD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Macquarie. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -47.73% vs 18.05% for BILD. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.
Performance
PLTG vs. BILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -55.06% return, which is significantly lower than BILD's 10.31% return.
PLTG
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -54.21%
- YTD
- -55.06%
- 1Y
- -47.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -55.06% | 100.70% |
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 10.31% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTG and BILD is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTG vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank
PLTG
BILD
PLTG vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 3.00 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 7.27 | -8.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTG vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and BILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -14.78% | -65.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.11% | -6.05% | -74.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.46% | -2.33% | -67.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -3.70% | -30.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.86% | 2.49% | +44.37% |
Volatility
PLTG vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 31.48% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 3.34%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.48% | 3.34% | +28.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.35% | 9.19% | +71.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.79% | 10.95% | +91.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 13.11% | +92.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.70% | 13.11% | +92.59% |
PLTG vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTG vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison
PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.36%, more than BILD's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 4.68% | 3.05% | 5.53% | 0.52% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 40.36% | 18.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTG and BILD have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (31.48%) compared to BILD (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -80.11% vs BILD's -14.78%.
On 1-year performance, BILD leads with 18.05% vs -47.73% for PLTG. On fees, BILD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILD has performed better with a 18.05% return vs -47.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PLTG.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 40.36%, compared with 4.68% for BILD.
PLTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.49% for BILD.
BILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTG and BILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer