PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO
PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTE.TO returned 10.84% vs -7.85% for YCST.NEO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -21.07% return, which is significantly lower than YCST.NEO's 12.72% return.
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- -7.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 65.52% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 12.72% | -16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
PLTE.TO
YCST.NEO
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTE.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.40 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -0.81 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTE.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.38 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | -0.18 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than YCST.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTE.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.92% | -19.70% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.32% | -19.54% | -21.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.82% | -12.62% | -19.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -8.56% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.78% | 9.91% | +11.87% |
Volatility
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) at 10.33%. This indicates that PLTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCST.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTE.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | 10.33% | +8.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.12% | 16.64% | +25.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.11% | 20.54% | +35.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 25.22% | +44.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 25.22% | +44.33% |
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
PLTE.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Dividend Comparison
PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.53%, more than YCST.NEO's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.01% | 10.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for PLTE.TO and YCST.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer