PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO
PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTE.TO returned 10.84% vs 2.79% for HPYM.TO. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. PLTE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HPYM.TO.
Performance
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -21.07% return, which is significantly lower than HPYM.TO's -1.25% return.
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 159.97% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -1.25% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTE.TO and HPYM.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PLTE.TO
HPYM.TO
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.73 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 2.05 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.62 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.37 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and HPYM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.92% | -6.19% | -37.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.32% | -3.85% | -37.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.82% | -2.71% | -29.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -1.94% | -15.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.78% | 1.36% | +20.42% |
Volatility
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) at 2.02%. This indicates that PLTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | 2.02% | +16.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.12% | 3.28% | +38.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.11% | 4.53% | +51.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 5.61% | +63.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.55% | 5.61% | +63.94% |
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.53%, more than HPYM.TO's 9.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.38% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTE.TO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
PLTE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PLTE.TO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
Find the right allocation for PLTE.TO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer