HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO).

HPYM.TO and HBIX.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HPYM.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025.

Performance

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	-0.72%	2.58%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-24.07%	-6.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -24.07% return.

HPYM.TO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: -0.72%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 2.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: -24.07%
• 6M: -46.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.

HBIX.NEO

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF

HPYM.TO

Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units

Return for Risk

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYM.TO

HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPYM.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.57	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPYM.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	-0.60	+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between HPYM.TO and HBIX.NEO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, less than HBIX.NEO's 37.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	9.29%	9.01%	8.07%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	37.84%	20.21%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HPYM.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and HBIX.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPYM.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-55.90%	+49.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-49.72%	+47.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-19.91%	+18.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HPYM.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.78%	52.86%	-48.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.64%	52.86%	-47.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.64%	52.86%	-47.22%