PLT vs. CRSH
PLT (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. PLT charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
PLT vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLT achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 3.14% return.
PLT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- -18.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLT vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLT Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF | -11.99% | 13.15% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.14% | -20.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLT and CRSH is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLT vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
PLT
CRSH
PLT vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF (PLT) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.71 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
PLT vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLT drawdown since its inception was -43.74%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLT and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.74% | -63.68% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.06% | -59.42% | +21.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -43.11% | +17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.14% | — |
Volatility
PLT vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.67% | 36.72% | +23.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.67% | 47.50% | +13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.67% | 47.50% | +13.17% |
PLT vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLT has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLT vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
PLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.02%, less than CRSH's 96.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.17% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
PLT Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF | 38.02% | 29.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLT and CRSH have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for PLT.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 38.02% for PLT.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for PLT and 0.99% for CRSH.
Find the right allocation for PLT and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer