PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLOO vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLOO vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOO achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


PLOO

1D
-6.42%
1M
2.35%
YTD
-11.52%
6M
-4.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOO vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLOO and QB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLOO vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLOO vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

3.17

-3.37

Drawdowns

PLOO vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOO drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOO and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-1.83%

-31.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.05%

-0.30%

-18.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-0.34%

-15.46%

Volatility

PLOO vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLOOQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.33%

5.75%

+44.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.33%

5.75%

+44.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.33%

5.75%

+44.58%

PLOO vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLOO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLOO vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

PLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.79%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLOO and QB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PLOO.

PLOO has the higher dividend yield at 25.79%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PLOO and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLOO and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer