PLHHX vs. PLGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX).
PLHHX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. PLGIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000.
Performance
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLHHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund | -4.49% | 19.91% | 17.00% | 20.33% | -18.53% | 20.30% | 16.50% | 27.02% | -10.19% | 7.77% |
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | -14.91% | 11.59% | 83.01% | 40.40% | -34.05% | 21.49% | 36.06% | 34.89% | 3.44% | 9.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLHHX achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly higher than PLGIX's -14.91% return.
PLHHX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.14%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PLGIX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -15.13%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLHHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLHHX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank
PLHHX
PLGIX
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLHHX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.16 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.40 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.04 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 0.14 | +6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLHHX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.16 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.47 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.41 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLHHX and PLGIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison
PLHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than PLGIX's 16.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLHHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund | 4.06% | 3.88% | 4.03% | 2.64% | 7.08% | 2.27% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 3.49% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | 16.99% | 14.45% | 63.77% | 5.99% | 11.57% | 11.34% | 7.03% | 8.01% | 16.41% | 7.05% | 4.64% | 12.51% |
Drawdowns
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLHHX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, smaller than the maximum PLGIX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLHHX and PLGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLHHX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -55.43% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -18.32% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -40.63% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -18.32% | +9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -13.31% | +7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 5.45% | -3.09% |
Volatility
PLHHX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) is 4.98%, while Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PLHHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLHHX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 5.47% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 11.68% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 21.30% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 30.09% | -14.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 25.38% | -8.53% |