PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLHHX vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLHHX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLHHX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return.


PLHHX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.54%
YTD
10.60%
6M
9.96%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLHHX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLHHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund
10.60%19.91%17.00%20.33%-18.53%20.30%16.50%27.02%-10.19%7.77%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PLHHX and SPY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.95

The correlation between PLHHX and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLHHX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLHHX
PLHHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLHHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLHHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLHHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PLHHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLHHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLHHX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLHHXSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.67

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.94

11.92

+2.02

PLHHX vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLHHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLHHX and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLHHX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLHHX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLHHX and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLHHXSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-55.19%

+21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.88%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.62%

-18.76%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-24.50%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-3.17%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-9.04%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.98%

-0.04%

Volatility

PLHHX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 5.03% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLHHXSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.87%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

9.85%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.50%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

17.15%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

17.95%

-1.12%

PLHHX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLHHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLHHX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

PLHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLHHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund
3.51%3.88%4.03%2.64%7.08%2.27%2.00%1.65%3.49%1.87%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PLHHX and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLHHX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLHHX dropped -33.47% vs SPY's -55.19%.

PLHHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLHHX and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer