PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGIX vs. PMYYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLGIX achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than PMYYX's 8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PLGIX has outperformed PMYYX with an annualized return of 20.25%, while PMYYX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.


PLGIX

1D
1.01%
1M
6.96%
YTD
6.43%
6M
5.35%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
35.74%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
20.25%

PMYYX

1D
0.17%
1M
4.59%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.84%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
6.43%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%
PMYYX
Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund
8.64%17.33%26.46%27.98%-15.94%30.93%17.69%32.52%-7.91%24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PLGIX and PMYYX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.88

The correlation between PLGIX and PMYYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGIX vs. PMYYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PMYYX
PMYYX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PMYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PMYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLGIXPMYYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

2.36

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

3.24

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.80

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.90

12.33

-9.43

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the PMYYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLGIX and PMYYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLGIXPMYYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.36

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.82

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.89

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.93

-0.48

Drawdowns

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than PMYYX's maximum drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGIX and PMYYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGIXPMYYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-35.25%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-10.02%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.39%

-18.92%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.63%

-23.52%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.63%

-35.25%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-4.12%

-9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

2.28%

+3.62%

Volatility

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX) at 2.98%. This indicates that PLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMYYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGIXPMYYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

2.98%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

9.09%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

12.03%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

16.81%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.44%

18.40%

+7.04%

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PMYYX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLGIX vs. PMYYX - Dividend Comparison

PLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.58%, more than PMYYX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
13.58%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%
PMYYX
Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund
2.54%2.76%4.47%2.62%5.26%9.25%2.41%4.76%2.36%2.71%1.21%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLGIX and PMYYX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGIX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PMYYX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLGIX dropped -55.43% vs PMYYX's -35.25%.

PMYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGIX and PMYYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer