PLHHX vs. FFGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX).
PLHHX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. FFGZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.
Performance
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLHHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund | -4.49% | 19.91% | 17.00% | 20.33% | -18.53% | 20.30% | 16.50% | 27.02% | -10.19% | 7.77% |
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | -0.78% | 9.13% | 5.02% | 8.32% | -11.07% | 2.85% | 8.59% | 10.68% | -0.80% | 1.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLHHX achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than FFGZX's -0.78% return.
PLHHX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.14%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FFGZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLHHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PLHHX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank
PLHHX
FFGZX
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLHHX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.12 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.99 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 8.42 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLHHX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.52 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLHHX and FFGZX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison
PLHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than FFGZX's 3.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLHHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund | 4.06% | 3.88% | 4.03% | 2.64% | 7.08% | 2.27% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 3.49% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | 3.46% | 3.30% | 3.18% | 2.88% | 3.11% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 7.35% | 3.00% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLHHX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLHHX and FFGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLHHX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -14.94% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -3.33% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -14.94% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -3.09% | -5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -2.29% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 0.79% | +1.57% |
Volatility
PLHHX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.85%. This indicates that PLHHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLHHX | FFGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 1.85% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 2.78% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 4.35% | +11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 5.03% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 4.39% | +12.46% |