PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGO vs. AAPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGO vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pelagos Insurance Capital Limited (PLGO) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLGO achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than AAPB's 23.70% return.


PLGO

1D
-1.72%
1M
1.59%
YTD
8.79%
6M
16.46%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPB

1D
-3.30%
1M
24.81%
YTD
23.70%
6M
12.69%
1Y
106.72%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGO vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PLGO
Pelagos Insurance Capital Limited
8.79%11.20%46.32%-1.78%
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
23.70%-0.93%47.02%-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PLGO and AAPB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGO vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLGO
PLGO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PLGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLGO vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pelagos Insurance Capital Limited (PLGO) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLGOAAPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.82

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

9.20

-4.59

PLGO vs. AAPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the AAPB Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLGO and AAPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLGOAAPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.40

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.38

+0.27

Drawdowns

PLGO vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGO drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum AAPB drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGO and AAPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGOAAPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

-58.13%

+28.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-28.11%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.70%

-3.30%

-7.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-19.36%

+8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

11.64%

-6.43%

Volatility

PLGO vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison

Pelagos Insurance Capital Limited (PLGO) has a higher volatility of 16.22% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) at 11.20%. This indicates that PLGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGOAAPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.22%

11.20%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.17%

31.96%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.01%

44.82%

-15.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.20%

51.33%

-19.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

51.33%

-19.13%

Dividends

PLGO vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison

PLGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than AAPB's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
3.55%4.39%0.00%18.75%
PLGO
Pelagos Insurance Capital Limited
2.60%2.55%2.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLGO and AAPB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGO has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to AAPB (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLGO dropped -29.91% vs AAPB's -58.13%.

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGO and AAPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer