PLGIX vs. PCBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX).
PLGIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. PCBIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000.
Performance
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | -14.91% | 11.59% | 83.01% | 40.40% | -34.05% | 21.49% | 36.06% | 34.89% | 3.44% | 33.67% |
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | -12.96% | 1.62% | 23.63% | 25.92% | -23.16% | 25.22% | 18.25% | 49.40% | -6.86% | 25.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLGIX achieves a -14.91% return, which is significantly lower than PCBIX's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PLGIX has outperformed PCBIX with an annualized return of 17.78%, while PCBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.
PLGIX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -15.13%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
PCBIX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -16.52%
- 1Y
- -11.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PLGIX and PCBIX have an expense ratio of 0.67%.
Return for Risk
PLGIX vs. PCBIX — Risk / Return Rank
PLGIX
PCBIX
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLGIX | PCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | -0.58 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | -0.71 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.91 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | -0.60 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | -1.81 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLGIX | PCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | -0.58 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.27 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.60 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLGIX and PCBIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Dividend Comparison
PLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than PCBIX's 6.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | 16.99% | 14.45% | 63.77% | 5.99% | 11.57% | 11.34% | 7.03% | 8.01% | 16.41% | 7.05% | 4.64% | 12.51% |
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | 6.68% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 2.51% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.02% | 12.24% | 3.31% | 2.49% | 6.30% |
Drawdowns
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than PCBIX's maximum drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGIX and PCBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLGIX | PCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.43% | -50.25% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.32% | -19.29% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -31.17% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.63% | -40.56% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.32% | -18.65% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -6.50% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.45% | 6.44% | -0.99% |
Volatility
PLGIX vs. PCBIX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) at 4.56%. This indicates that PLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLGIX | PCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 4.56% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 10.34% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.30% | 18.28% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.09% | 18.53% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 19.09% | +6.29% |