PLFRX vs. SFHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX).
PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011. SFHIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 14, 2014.
Performance
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | -1.02% | 5.70% | 8.14% | 11.50% | -0.95% | 3.90% | 1.77% | 588.11% | 0.53% | 3.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLFRX achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than SFHIX's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFRX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.07% annualized return.
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
SFHIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLFRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLFRX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank
PLFRX
SFHIX
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.79 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 2.50 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.49 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.71 | +1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 5.65 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.79 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.05 | 2.59 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.35 | 0.56 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.52 | +0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLFRX and SFHIX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison
PLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, less than SFHIX's 7.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.01% | 7.61% | 8.07% | 8.06% | 4.99% | 3.20% | 3.93% | 142.83% | 5.03% | 4.00% | 4.22% | 4.58% |
Drawdowns
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLFRX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum SFHIX drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFRX and SFHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -19.94% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -2.25% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.44% | -5.57% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.75% | -19.94% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.46% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.84% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.68% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.70%. This indicates that PLFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.70% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.79% | 1.34% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 2.16% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 1.98% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 46.68% | -42.93% |