PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFRX vs. SFHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFRX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SFHIX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFRX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.12% annualized return.


PLFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
5.09%

SFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.60%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
26.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
0.99%6.68%8.38%13.94%-2.01%4.36%1.26%8.30%0.39%4.33%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.47%5.70%8.14%11.50%-0.95%3.90%1.77%588.11%0.53%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFRX and SFHIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.56

The correlation between PLFRX and SFHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFRX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFRX
PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SFHIX
SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLFRXSFHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.84

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.15

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

7.61

+3.86

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SFHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFRX and SFHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFRX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum SFHIX drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFRX and SFHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFRXSFHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-19.94%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-2.25%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.17%

-2.25%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.44%

-5.57%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

-19.94%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-0.83%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.63%

-0.12%

Volatility

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.47%. This indicates that PLFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFRXSFHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.47%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

1.44%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

1.67%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

2.01%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

46.70%

-42.93%

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFRX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison

PLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than SFHIX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
7.10%7.18%8.47%8.92%4.39%3.65%3.68%5.10%5.03%4.46%4.21%4.52%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.60%7.61%8.07%8.06%4.99%3.20%3.93%142.83%5.03%4.00%4.22%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLFRX and SFHIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLFRX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to SFHIX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFRX dropped -18.75% vs SFHIX's -19.94%.

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFRX and SFHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer