PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. SUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDR vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLDR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SUSA

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.04%
6M
13.83%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
14.82%
ALL TIME*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.64M$6.12M$5.72M

PLDR vs. SUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
1.69%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.54%
SUSA
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
14.01%15.72%22.43%23.88%-21.38%15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and SUSA is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.94

The correlation between PLDR and SUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PLDR vs. SUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLDR
SUSA

Technology

38.3%
40.7%

Communication Services

11.1%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
7.8%

Financial Services

9.9%
11.5%

Industrials

8.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.1%

Utilities

3.4%
1.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.7%

Technology

PLDR
38.3%
SUSA
40.7%

Communication Services

PLDR
11.1%
SUSA
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PLDR
10.1%
SUSA
7.8%

Financial Services

PLDR
9.9%
SUSA
11.5%

Industrials

PLDR
8.4%
SUSA
9.5%

Healthcare

PLDR
7.5%
SUSA
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

PLDR
5.3%
SUSA
4.1%

Utilities

PLDR
3.4%
SUSA
1.4%

Energy

PLDR
3.1%
SUSA
3.4%

Basic Materials

PLDR
2.3%
SUSA
2.3%

Real Estate

PLDR
0.6%
SUSA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. SUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SUSA
SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLDR vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDRSUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

PLDR vs. SUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. SUSA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRSUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

PLDR vs. SUSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDRSUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

PLDR vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDR vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.37%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUSA
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
0.82%0.89%1.15%1.32%1.52%0.98%1.17%1.52%1.72%1.40%1.56%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDR and SUSA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

SUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while SUSA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.25% for SUSA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDR and SUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer