PLDR vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLDR is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. PLDR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

PLDR vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PLDR

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	6.73%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

PLDR vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLDR	QCON
Technology	24.1%	-
Communication Services	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	-
Industrials	8.3%	1.0%
Financial Services	6.9%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	-
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Utilities	2.9%	1.5%
Energy	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.4%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

PLDR vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 43
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLDR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLDR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDR drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDR and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLDR	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.58%	0.00%	-29.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.59%	0.00%	-8.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLDR	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	0.00%	+12.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	0.00%	+17.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	0.00%	+17.04%

PLDR vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLDR vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	0.36%	0.37%	0.38%	0.56%	0.63%	0.39%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PLDR or QCON?

On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLDR or QCON?

QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLDR or QCON?

PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between PLDR and QCON?

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.32% for QCON.