PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. MEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLDR vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLDR vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
-8.58%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.57%
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
0.58%3.76%3.40%3.93%0.10%-0.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLDR achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than MEAR's 0.58% return.


PLDR

1D
0.67%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-5.85%
1Y
10.67%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*

MEAR

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.27%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLDR vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR
PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MEAR
MEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLDRMEARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.81

-2.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

3.78

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.73

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.77

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.94

21.16

-18.22

PLDR vs. MEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the MEAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLDR and MEAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLDRMEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.81

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.09

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and MEAR is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PLDR vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison

PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than MEAR's 2.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.41%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.95%3.44%3.30%0.88%0.30%0.90%1.57%1.36%1.01%0.81%0.53%

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDR drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDR and MEAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRMEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-2.68%

-26.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-0.86%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.90%

-0.24%

-9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-0.19%

-8.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

0.15%

+3.59%

Volatility

PLDR vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.37%. This indicates that PLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLDRMEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

0.37%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

0.60%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

1.16%

+15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

0.98%

+16.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

1.52%

+15.64%