PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLDR vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLDR vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
-9.19%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.57%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
24.94%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%0.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLDR achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 24.94% return.


PLDR

1D
2.64%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
-9.19%
6M
-5.46%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.00%
YTD
24.94%
6M
21.95%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLDR vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR
PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLDRFAARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.97

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

2.65

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.71

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.93

7.95

-5.01

PLDR vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLDR and FAAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLDRFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.97

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and FAAR is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PLDR vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FAAR's 9.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.41%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.21%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDR drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDR and FAAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-18.03%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-11.54%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-0.51%

-10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-7.97%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.93%

-0.24%

Volatility

PLDR vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) is 5.30%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that PLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLDRFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

5.66%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

10.64%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

15.33%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

13.00%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

11.54%

+5.62%