PLD vs. AAPL
PLD (Prologis, Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. PLD operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PLD returned 14.79%/yr vs 29.36%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLD vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 14.79%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.36% annualized return.
PLD
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 17.45%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 43.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
PLD vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 17.45% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLD and AAPL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PLD and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PLD:
$142.43B
AAPL:
$4.30T
PLD:
$3.88
AAPL:
$8.24
PLD:
38.30
AAPL:
35.35
PLD:
15.91
AAPL:
9.60
PLD:
2.67
AAPL:
40.37
PLD:
$8.95B
AAPL:
$451.44B
PLD:
$3.88B
AAPL:
$216.07B
PLD:
$7.71B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLD vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
PLD
AAPL
PLD vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 3.40 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 8.47 | +6.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLD vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.70% | -81.80% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -13.80% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.37% | -33.36% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -33.36% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -38.52% | -4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -7.64% | +4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -29.59% | +12.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 5.53% | -2.64% |
Volatility
PLD vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 6.73% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 16.53% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.46% | 22.64% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 27.52% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 28.92% | -1.92% |
Dividends
PLD vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.76% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
PLD vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLD vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLD and AAPL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to PLD (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLD dropped -84.70% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLD and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer