PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLD vs. 0002.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and CLP Holdings (0002.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLD is traded in USD, while 0002.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0002.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLD having a 12.04% return and 0002.HK slightly higher at 12.14%. Over the past 10 years, PLD has outperformed 0002.HK with an annualized return of 14.08%, while 0002.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.


PLD

1D
-0.35%
1M
-3.60%
6M
10.54%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
14.08%

0002.HK

1D
0.34%
1M
4.81%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.14%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
3.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
12.04%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%
0002.HK
CLP Holdings
12.14%11.59%6.79%19.40%-24.56%13.76%-8.50%-3.60%14.45%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PLD and 0002.HK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2007

0.04

The correlation between PLD and 0002.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLD vs. 0002.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

0002.HK
0002.HK Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
0002.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0002.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
0002.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
0002.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
0002.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and CLP Holdings (0002.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLD0002.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.38

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

9.56

+1.43

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the 0002.HK Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLD and 0002.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, which is greater than 0002.HK's maximum drawdown of -38.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and 0002.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLD0002.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-38.31%

-46.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-5.29%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.37%

-12.31%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.30%

-33.79%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.30%

-37.97%

-5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

0.00%

-7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-10.17%

-7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.41%

+0.71%

Volatility

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Volatility Comparison

Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to CLP Holdings (0002.HK) at 3.99%. This indicates that PLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0002.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLD0002.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

3.99%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

9.59%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

11.08%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.05%

15.93%

+11.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.02%

15.89%

+11.13%

Dividends

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Dividend Comparison

PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than 0002.HK's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0002.HK
CLP Holdings
4.18%4.53%4.75%4.81%5.44%3.94%4.30%3.76%3.36%3.58%3.87%4.02%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.95%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Financials

PLD vs. 0002.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and CLP Holdings. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. PLD values in USD, 0002.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


PLD and 0002.HK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLD and 0002.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer