PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLAY vs. QQMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLAY vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLAY achieves a -33.13% return, which is significantly lower than QQMG's 13.63% return.


PLAY

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.81%
6M
-42.25%
YTD
-33.13%
1Y
-61.42%
3Y*
-37.97%
5Y*
-20.10%
10Y*
-12.45%
ALL TIME*
-3.57%

QQMG

1D
0.77%
1M
-2.81%
6M
12.56%
YTD
13.63%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.16M$13.93M$19.34M
$914.06K$1.31M$1.13M

PLAY vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
-33.13%-44.47%-45.79%51.95%-7.71%0.95%
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
13.63%22.16%25.66%55.00%-31.56%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PLAY and QQMG is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.31

The correlation between PLAY and QQMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLAY vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLAY
PLAY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QQMG
QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLAY vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLAYQQMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.21

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

1.95

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

6.22

-7.59

PLAY vs. QQMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the QQMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLAY and QQMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLAY vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLAY drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than QQMG's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLAY and QQMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLAYQQMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.18%

-35.43%

-57.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.05%

-12.67%

-53.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.03%

-22.79%

-63.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.82%

-7.14%

-77.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.81%

-9.44%

-29.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.03%

3.96%

+44.07%

Volatility

PLAY vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) has a higher volatility of 19.72% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) at 7.21%. This indicates that PLAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLAYQQMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.72%

7.21%

+12.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.59%

16.64%

+36.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.90%

20.09%

+50.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.08%

23.81%

+36.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.03%

23.81%

+47.22%

Dividends

PLAY vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison

PLAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.53%1.15%0.67%
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.38%0.41%0.50%0.60%0.82%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLAY and QQMG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLAY has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to QQMG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLAY dropped -93.18% vs QQMG's -35.43%.

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLAY and QQMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer