PL vs. SILJ
PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock, while SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, PL returned 87.88%/yr vs 36.21%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -14.24% return.
PL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -21.54%
- 6M
- -23.04%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 226.22%
- 3Y*
- 87.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.82%
SILJ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -15.01%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- YTD
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- 61.72%
- 3Y*
- 36.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.39%
PL vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 12.32% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -14.24% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and SILJ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
PL
SILJ
PL vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 1.51 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 3.30 | +8.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.11%, which is greater than SILJ's maximum drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.11% | -79.04% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.02% | -41.12% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.02% | -41.12% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.91% | -41.12% | -15.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -41.36% | -13.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.24% | 18.73% | +0.51% |
Volatility
PL vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 24.26% compared to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 13.31%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.26% | 13.31% | +10.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.92% | 47.78% | +26.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.22% | 57.99% | +46.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.87% | 45.00% | +39.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.87% | 46.34% | +38.53% |
Dividends
PL vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.34% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and SILJ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to SILJ (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.11% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PL and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer