PL vs. SILJ
PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock, while SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, PL returned 117.50%/yr vs 44.49%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 68.00% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -6.32% return.
PL
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- 68.00%
- 6M
- 67.83%
- 1Y
- 443.11%
- 3Y*
- 117.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -6.32%
- 6M
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- 78.43%
- 3Y*
- 44.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
PL vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 68.00% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -6.32% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and SILJ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
PL
SILJ
PL vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.24 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.15 | 2.01 | +7.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.19 | 4.72 | +23.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.11%, which is greater than SILJ's maximum drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.11% | -79.04% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.83% | -39.16% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.17% | -39.16% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.54% | -35.68% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -41.38% | -13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 16.67% | -0.85% |
Volatility
PL vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 41.66% compared to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 20.11%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.66% | 20.11% | +21.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.65% | 48.09% | +25.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.54% | 57.53% | +46.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 44.96% | +40.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 46.43% | +38.58% |
Dividends
PL vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.14% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and SILJ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (41.66%) compared to SILJ (20.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.11% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PL and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer