PL vs. QUBT
PL (Planet Labs PBC) and QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) are both stocks. PL operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while QUBT operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PL returned 25.63%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for QUBT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 57.96% return, which is significantly higher than QUBT's -3.22% return.
PL
- 1D
- -8.84%
- 1M
- -23.54%
- YTD
- 57.96%
- 6M
- 70.78%
- 1Y
- 470.51%
- 3Y*
- 106.65%
- 5Y*
- 25.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -17.59%
- 1Y
- -43.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
PL vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 57.96% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -37.24% |
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -3.22% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -47.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and QUBT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between PL and QUBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PL:
$10.76B
QUBT:
$2.22B
PL:
-$1.17
QUBT:
-$0.21
PL:
29.61
QUBT:
428.61
PL:
24.26
QUBT:
1.39
PL:
$335.61M
QUBT:
$4.33M
PL:
$186.28M
QUBT:
-$667.00K
PL:
-$125.70M
QUBT:
-$52.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank
PL
QUBT
PL vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 0.99 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.79 | -0.58 | +12.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.80 | -0.89 | +37.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, smaller than the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and QUBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.73% | -97.53% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.23% | -74.37% | +34.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.17% | -82.40% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.73% | -95.63% | +9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.40% | -61.33% | +21.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.90% | -72.90% | +23.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | 48.67% | -35.79% |
Volatility
PL vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 39.48% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) at 33.55%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.48% | 33.55% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.71% | 67.37% | +11.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.61% | 103.81% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.98% | 133.05% | -52.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.91% | 177.48% | -97.57% |
Dividends
PL vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PL nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PL vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and QUBT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to QUBT (33.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.73% vs QUBT's -97.53%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PL and QUBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer